"She's a warrior against environmental pollution and a fighter for public health" - the Ohio News Network, April 18, 2007.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
C8 Science Panel Extends Deadline
The C8 Science Panel needs three more months to complete their work.
On Monday, members of the panel joined a status hearing in Wood County Circuit Court via teleconference to explain their request for more time.
Read the full story here:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1221:web-extra-c8-science-panel-requests-more-time&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Monday, June 25, 2012
OEPA Acknowledges C8 Filtration Breakthroughs
Despite an earlier denial, Ohio EPA has confirmed that C8 has broken through local filtration systems on at least six occasions.
On June 6, The Anchor reported that C8 was still making its way into some local water supplies even after the installation of filtration systems intended to remove the unregulated manmade substance. C8, also known as PFOA or perfluorooctanoic acid, became a source of controversy in the Mid Ohio Valley when it was detected in six local water supplies – leading to a class action lawsuit against DuPont and a landmark health study intended to determine whether or not exposure may cause human disease.
In response to the public health concern, DuPont constructed industrial scale filtration systems for the impacted water districts based on carbon filtration – meaning that the efficiency of the filtration is dependent upon timely and fresh change outs of carbon filtration material.
Despite the installation of technology intended to reduce the concentration of C8 in local water supplies to non detectable levels, sampling results obtained from the EPA in May revealed that small but measurable amounts were breaking through some of the filtration systems – an indication that in some locations carbon change outs are not being performed frequently enough to prevent breakthroughs.
Read the full story at The Anchor:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1188:special-report-oepa-acknowledges-c8-filtration-breakthroughs&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
On June 6, The Anchor reported that C8 was still making its way into some local water supplies even after the installation of filtration systems intended to remove the unregulated manmade substance. C8, also known as PFOA or perfluorooctanoic acid, became a source of controversy in the Mid Ohio Valley when it was detected in six local water supplies – leading to a class action lawsuit against DuPont and a landmark health study intended to determine whether or not exposure may cause human disease.
In response to the public health concern, DuPont constructed industrial scale filtration systems for the impacted water districts based on carbon filtration – meaning that the efficiency of the filtration is dependent upon timely and fresh change outs of carbon filtration material.
Despite the installation of technology intended to reduce the concentration of C8 in local water supplies to non detectable levels, sampling results obtained from the EPA in May revealed that small but measurable amounts were breaking through some of the filtration systems – an indication that in some locations carbon change outs are not being performed frequently enough to prevent breakthroughs.
Read the full story at The Anchor:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1188:special-report-oepa-acknowledges-c8-filtration-breakthroughs&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
C8 Detected in Filtered Water
Despite the installation of technology meant to filter C8, very small amounts can still be found dripping from the taps of households served by some Mid Ohio Valley water systems.
Sampling results obtained from the EPA reveal that small but measurable amounts of the controversial manufacturing chemical routinely break through some of the filtration systems. DuPont has provided the means to reduce the concentration of C8 to non detectable levels, but the court mandated process lacks regulatory oversight.
Read the story here:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1176:web-extra-c8-detected-in-filtered-water&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Sampling results obtained from the EPA reveal that small but measurable amounts of the controversial manufacturing chemical routinely break through some of the filtration systems. DuPont has provided the means to reduce the concentration of C8 to non detectable levels, but the court mandated process lacks regulatory oversight.
Read the story here:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1176:web-extra-c8-detected-in-filtered-water&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Thursday, May 10, 2012
EPA Orders Nationwide Monitoring for C8
The US EPA is ordering the monitoring of public water supplies for a new
list of chemicals, including C8.
The agency has standards for 91 contaminants in drinking
water, and the Safe Drinking Water Act requires the EPA to identify up to 30
additional unregulated contaminants for monitoring every five years. Last week,
the EPA released a list of 28 chemicals and two viruses to be monitored by
about 6,000 public water systems as part of the unregulated contaminant
monitoring program.
“The monitoring that will take place will provide EPA with
invaluable information about what municipalities are seeing in their drinking
water all across the country,” said EPA acting assistant administrator for
Water Nancy Stoner. “The results of this multi-year monitoring effort will help
inform EPA’s work to ensure Americans receive safe drinking water.”
The EPA will spend more than $20 million to support the
project, which will provide a clearer picture of the frequency and levels at
which these contaminants are found in drinking water systems nationwide. It will also help regulators determine
whether additional protections are needed to ensure safe drinking water.
Using methods perfected as recently as 2009, the EPA has called on all
public water systems serving more than 10,000 people and 800 smaller systems to
monitor for C8 over a 12 month period from January 2013 through December 2015. The
reporting threshold for PFOA (also known as perfluorooctanoic acid or C8) is
.02 parts per billion – or 20 parts per trillion – far less than levels
detected in local water supplies.
The presence of the manufacturing substance in area water supplies lead
to a class action lawsuit brought by Mid-Ohio Valley residents
against DuPont who used the compound at nearby Washington Works in the
production of Teflon since the mid 1950s.
To resolve the suit, the court appointed the C8 Science
Panel – a group of three epidemiologists – to determine if it was “more likely
than not” that exposure could be linked to disease. In December, the science panel released their
initial set of probable link findings and announced a link between C8 exposure
and pregnancy induced hypertension. Last month, the panel linked C8 to kidney
and testicular cancer. Their final reports are expected before the end of July.
Consequently, a three-member medical panel has been appointed to determine what
type of medical monitoring should be made available to the members of the class
in response to the epidemiologists’ findings.
In the meantime, a federal lawsuit brought by the Little
Hocking Water Association against DuPont over the contamination of their
aquifer and wellfield is ongoing.
Monday, April 16, 2012
C8 Linked to Cancer in MOV Residents
An independent panel of three epidemiologists have concluded that exposure to the manufacturing substance known as C8 or PFOA is linked to two types of cancer in Mid Ohio Valley residents.
The C8 Science Panel released their new findings on Monday morning. It‘s the latest development in the class action lawsuit brought by local residents against DuPont over the presence of the manufacturing chemical PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, in their drinking water. As a result of the findings, a medical panel has been established to determine what type of medical monitoring is appropriate for class members.
What began as the C8 Health Project has become the largest study ever undertaken to determine the link between PFOA exposure and cancer. An analysis of 21 types of cancer yielded two probable link findings.
Read the full story in The Anchor:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1096:web-extra-c8-science-panel-links-c8-to-testicular-kidney-cancer&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
The C8 Science Panel released their new findings on Monday morning. It‘s the latest development in the class action lawsuit brought by local residents against DuPont over the presence of the manufacturing chemical PFOA, or perfluorooctanoic acid, in their drinking water. As a result of the findings, a medical panel has been established to determine what type of medical monitoring is appropriate for class members.
What began as the C8 Health Project has become the largest study ever undertaken to determine the link between PFOA exposure and cancer. An analysis of 21 types of cancer yielded two probable link findings.
Read the full story in The Anchor:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1096:web-extra-c8-science-panel-links-c8-to-testicular-kidney-cancer&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Labels:
C8,
C8 Health Project,
C8 Medical Panel,
C8 Science Panel
Thursday, April 12, 2012
New Findings Expected Monday
The C8 Science Panel will release their next set of probable link findings on Monday morning in Vienna, West Virginia. Health concerns to be addressed include diabetes and cancer.
The panel of three epidemiologists are wrapping up their work, which will determine the outcome of the Mid Ohio Valley class action lawsuit brought by residents against DuPont over the presence of the manufacturing substance, PFOA, in their public water supplies.
The term “probable link” is court terminology, not scientific jargon. Specifically, the C8 Science Panel was convened for the purpose of determining whether, given the available scientific evidence, there is "more likely than not" a connection between PFOA exposure and human disease in class members.
In December, the panel released their conclusion that there was an association between C8 exposure and pregnancy induced hypertension. The panel is scheduled to release all of their findings by the end of July.
The panel of three epidemiologists are wrapping up their work, which will determine the outcome of the Mid Ohio Valley class action lawsuit brought by residents against DuPont over the presence of the manufacturing substance, PFOA, in their public water supplies.
The term “probable link” is court terminology, not scientific jargon. Specifically, the C8 Science Panel was convened for the purpose of determining whether, given the available scientific evidence, there is "more likely than not" a connection between PFOA exposure and human disease in class members.
In December, the panel released their conclusion that there was an association between C8 exposure and pregnancy induced hypertension. The panel is scheduled to release all of their findings by the end of July.
C8 Medical Panel Appointed
DuPont and attorneys for local residents who settled a class action lawsuit against DuPont in 2005 over releases of C8 or PFOA from DuPont’s Washington Works plant announced today that they have jointly selected a three member panel of independent, well-qualified and respected medical doctors – the “C8 Medical Panel” – to determine the nature and extent of whatever medical monitoring may be appropriate under the terms of the settlement.
Read the full story in The Anchor:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1094:web-extra-c8-medical-panel-selected&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Read the full story in The Anchor:
http://www.theanchornews.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1094:web-extra-c8-medical-panel-selected&catid=2:community-news&Itemid=15
Labels:
C8 Health Project,
C8 Medical Panel,
C8 Science Panel,
PFOA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)